Lesson overview
This lesson explores the complexity of human communication, why miscommunication frequently occurs, and how it can be prevented. Inspired by Katherine Hampsten's ideas, learners discuss transmission and transactional models, subjective perception, and strategies for clearer, more active communication. Learners participate in practical activities, vocabulary exercises, and role plays to identify communication breakdowns and practice techniques to avoid misunderstanding.
Sequence: Warm-up (7 min) → Vocabulary (12 min) → Media / reading (12 min) → Functional language (10 min) → Debate (15 min).
1. Warm-up & lead-in · 7 minutes
- Can you recall a time when you said something, but the other person completely misunderstood your message?
- Why do you think people misinterpret each other even when speaking the same language?
- What steps do you usually take to check that someone understood you correctly?
2. Key vocabulary · 12 minutes
Match each word or phrase to a definition. Select the corresponding letter.
Definitions
- the act of making something less confusing or more understandable
- a view of communication as an interactive exchange in which meaning is co-created
- listening attentively and engaging with both the content and emotion of the message
- a process in communication where responses are used to clarify or adjust messages
- an individual's unique set of experiences, beliefs, and emotions that shape how they interpret messages
Words and phrases
- perceptual filter
- feedback loop
- transactional model
- active listening
- clarification
Examples
- perceptual filter: Her perceptual filter made her see the feedback as criticism instead of constructive advice.
- feedback loop: They used feedback loops in meetings to confirm everyone understood the new procedures.
- transactional model: The transactional model helped the team realize they create meaning together during discussions.
- active listening: Active listening involves nodding, paraphrasing, and asking questions as someone speaks.
- clarification: He asked for clarification after realizing the instructions were ambiguous.
3. Video & reading comprehension · 12 minutes
Watch the video on YouTubeOpens the video in a new tabVideo activities
1. According to the video, what is the difference between passive hearing and active listening?
2. How do perceptual filters contribute to miscommunication, as described in the video?
3. The video suggests four strategies to improve communication. Name two and describe how you could apply them in your work or life.
Vocabulary and grammar: fill in the blanks
Practise language from the video in new contexts. Complete each sentence using one word or phrase from the word bank. Use each answer once.
Word bank: confusion · express · listening · receive · passive · interpretation · experience · argument · miscommunication · perception
- It can be difficult to yourself clearly when emotions are involved.
- If you don't clarify your message, might occur.
- It is important to actively feedback from others to improve.
- When you give only a response, it shows you may not be truly engaged.
- Your past can influence how you interpret new information.
- Good communication requires both speaking and with others.
- A polite discussion can turn into if participants misinterpret each other.
- Sharing your honest will help others understand your perspective.
- Sometimes can arise if people are distracted by their surroundings.
- Everyone has a unique that affects the way they see a situation.
Reading and comprehension
During a weekly team meeting at Apex Innovations, Maria, an experienced project manager, presented a new schedule for an upcoming launch. As she explained the timeline, she noticed several colleagues looked confused, but she assumed everyone understood.
Later, Sam, responsible for the technical side, began coding based on the old timeline, and Lisa, who manages client expectations, informed the client that the project would be ready a week earlier than Maria intended. When Maria discovered the disconnect, she was frustrated, feeling she'd been perfectly clear. Everyone else was equally certain they had followed the correct instructions. The confusion led to tension and delays.
Upon reflection, team members realized they all had interpreted Maria's words through their own experiences: some focused on the technical tasks, others on dates, and some thought the discussion was only preliminary. The team later introduced feedback loops in meetings, paraphrasing key points and using more direct questions, which improved clarity and reduced future mistakes.
- Gist: What caused the misunderstanding in the team meeting?
- Detail: What specific measures did the team take to improve their communication after the meeting?
- Critical: If you had been Maria, what different approach could you have used to ensure understanding?
4. Functional language · 10 minutes
Clarifying and checking for understanding in complex discussions
- Could you what you meant by that last point?
- Let me what I've understood so far, to be sure we're on the same page.
- Just to , the deadline has moved to next Friday, correct?
- I might have misunderstood; could you your main concern?
- It seems there was a in communication about the meeting time.
5. Stakeholder debate / role-play · 15 minutes
Project Manager (Maria)
You believe all instructions should be clear if stated once and that misunderstanding is mostly due to others not paying attention. Argue that team members must listen and ask questions.
Technical Lead (Sam)
Technical details matter most; you feel overwhelmed by too many changes. Argue that managers must repeat key points and check understanding, because technical staff can miss subtle shifts.
HR Manager
Your priority is inclusive communication. Argue that cultural, personal, and language backgrounds all affect perception, so clarification and feedback are everyone’s responsibility.
Licensed material: do not copy, share or redistribute.